
#EPSON PERFECTION V700 PHOTO PRO#
T2 - Comparison of the Epson Perfection V700 Photo Flatbed and the Vidar VXR‐16 Dosimetry PRO AdvantageTM Film Scanners for Use with Radiochromic Film Hence, an institution already having a Vidar system may find its use with radiochromic film attractive.",
#EPSON PERFECTION V700 PHOTO SOFTWARE#
Although the Epson scanner is a relatively inexpensive method for analyzing radiochromic film, the lack of commercially available software for it could be a major disadvantage. Conclusion: No clear significant accuracy advantage was noted in either system, provided the leading and trailing 1 cm film edges were neglected with the Vidar system.

In both systems, cross profiles for an unirradiated film showed deviations in PV no more than 2% of the mean. Scanner noise was minimal Epson showed a maximum SD of 1.00% from the mean of the central ROI, Vidar showed 1.14%. From 0 to 512 cGy, identical films showed a 10% wider PV range for Vidar than Epson. Epson mean PV differed by up to 18% for all dosed regions from landscape to portrait orientation, while only up to 5% for Vidar. Results: For the range of doses measured, average pixel values of a central 1.5×1.5 cm region of interest (ROI) were reproducible within 0.1% standard deviation with Vidar and approximately 0.2% with Epson. RIT V5.0 was used to determine pixel value (PV) of Vidar scans, while ImageJ software was used for the Epson scans. Using radiochromic EBT film irradiated to a known range of doses 0–512 cGy using eight 3×3 cm fields on a single film, both scanners were characterized for scan repeatability, orientation effects, uniformity, and scanner noise. Method and Materials: This project compares the Vidar VXR Dosimetry Pro and the Epson Perfection V700 Photo flatbed scanner. Hence, an institution already having a Vidar system may find its use with radiochromic film attractive.Ībstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance and utility of a commercially available flatbed scanner with that of a widely‐used medical film scanner for use with radiochromic film.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance and utility of a commercially available flatbed scanner with that of a widely‐used medical film scanner for use with radiochromic film.
